both have at least five more specific subtemplates.) - Ilmari Karonen ( talk) 18:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC) Reply Broadening G8 to apply to sub-pages sounds like a good idea. There is infrastructure to be created doesn't each criterion have its dedicated template? Waltham, The Duke of 03:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Reply Oh, right. I didn't expect the addition of a criterion to the list to be conducted so matter-of-factly, though, even if uncontroversial. Personally, I agree with Ilmari Karonen that the interpretation of the criteria should be stricter, as there is less potential for abuse this way. Ilmari Karonen ( talk) 01:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Reply My main question was to see if the criterion was used in a wider sense than what the phrasing indicated I did not know if there was such a precedent. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 01:08, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Reply As I've stated before, I dislike this increasingly common habit of using G6 as a catch-all criterion for everything not covered by the other criteria, but I do agree that these should obviously be speedied. Might be worth mentioning directly there, but evidently it does (had a fair few of these deleted under G6 myself, so it's already in operation). Waltham, The Duke of 01:03, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Reply Yes. Is there a reason that G10 shouldn't be used for legal threats? ~ JohnnyMrNinja 03:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Reply Does the deletion of a documentation page for a deleted template fall under G6?Īnd if not, would it be a valid idea for a new template criterion? Template:S-fic/doc is what provokes this question. Though I do agree that there is some overlap between G3 and G10. Rossami, maybe 0.333 per day? X clamation point 03:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Reply I think it can be plausibly said that any legal threat can be considered an attack page, though not every legal threat or attack page can be considered vandalism. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 02:23, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Reply Yet the same can be said for G10 and G3. I have modified the wording of G10 to clearly include this. Can you give us actual numbers? How many per day are you seeing? Rossami (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Reply Ī page that is entirely legal threat would easily qualify as an attack page, G10. (See bullet three of the 'new criteria' standards at the top of this talk page.) A few over the course of weeks doesn't yet seem like enough to me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |